Task Force Media Notes, May 27
This is part of a series of regular reports
to update, inform, educate and stimulate public discussion
GEORGIA STATE DROPS WRESTLING AND ADDS WOMENS TRACK
The sport of wrestling took another serious hit in early May, when
Georgia State University announced that it would drop its wrestling team
and add a womens track and field program. According to athletic
director Orby Moss, a review of the athletics program revealed
wrestling no longer fit into the long-range strategic plans of the
athletic program.
At the surface, this could be considered just another example of how
gender quotas destroy opportunities for male athletes. But, a close look
shows there is more to the Georgia State decision than strict
proportionality problems.
In 1991, Georgia State started a new Div. I wrestling team, a decision
that excited the wrestling world. Georgia State became the only varsity
program in the state, and the team that was the farthest south on the
East Coast. Georgia State, under head coaches Gary Kurdelmeier and Keith
Walton, put together a solid team, which had a winning record during its
seven-year run. The team had also been very successful in fund-raising
to support the athletic department.
According to the press release, wrestling interest has not grown in
the area as hoped; recruitment, competition and travel have had to
constantly expand outside the region...
This assessment is disturbing. Clearly, wrestling in the Southeast has
grown and continues to grow. In 1997, Georgia had 202 programs with
5,234 wrestlers and Florida had 277 programs with 6,831 wrestlers. Both
states had many nationally ranked wrestlers on the age-group levels. An
outstanding team could be generated from keeping the top local talent in
the region.
Georgia State is a member of the Trans America Athletic Conference,
which does not sponsor wrestling. Wrestling is no longer included in the
Southeast Conference, the largest Div. I conference in the region. The
hope was the Georgia State program might help encourage other area
universities to start wrestling. But, with the severe restrictions
caused by Title IX, and the court rulings such as the Brown University
case, it is nearly impossible for colleges to add mens sports these
days. The wrestling community mourns the loss of Georgia State, which
had the courage to start a wrestling program, but did not have the
fortitude to stay with that good decision.
PORTLAND STATE PROPOSES TO CUT WRESTLING AND BASEBALL
One of the top wrestling programs in the Pacific Northwest is in
danger, as Portland State University is considering a proposal to drop
two mens sports, wrestling and baseball. The recommendation was made by
Portland States Office of Finance and Administration, and is being run
through various athletic and student committees. A final decision by PSU
President Daniel Bernstein is expected by June 1.
Portland State wrestling had a similar challenge in 1997, when a
faculty committee and administrators proposed its elimination. However,
there was so much local support and interest in wrestling that
university quickly dropped the idea.
This threat seems to be even greater this time. Portland States move
up to Div. I is completed next year, with full membership in the Big Sky
Conference. According to the press release, neither baseball nor
wrestling are in core sports in the Big Sky. In addition, PSU must add a
conference core sport, mens tennis.
The other two reasons for the program cut proposal are the same tired
excuses used by other colleges to eliminate opportunity: progress with
regard to Title IX and gender-equity and not enough funding to meet
the demands of a Division I athletic program.
If any team at Portland State has earned the right to move up to Div.
I, it is wrestling. Clearly, the wrestling team is one of the most
successful programs in school history. Portland State has been a
powerhouse in Div. II wrestling, with national team titles in 1967, 1989
and 1990. The wrestling team has produced numerous individual national
champions. In addition, Portland State wrestlers have excelled on the
international level. The first U.S. wrestler to ever win a World gold
medal in wrestling, Rick Sanders, attended Portland State. Sanders won
two Olympic silver medals for the United States. Other Portland State
Olympians were Dan Mello (1980), Anthony Amado (1988) and Travis West
(1992).
The fact that wrestling is not a Big Sky conference sport should not be
a big deal. Many colleges have teams that are not a part of their
football/basketball conference. Portland State wrestling and baseball
have been accepted into the Pac-10 Conference, which is even more
prestigious than the Big Sky.
Portland State is not the first college to attempt to drop sports as it
moved up from Div. II to Div. I. Nor is Portland State the first to site
gender equity as a reason to eliminate mens teams. However, dropping
wrestling at Portland State makes no sense. The team is excellent, and
can succeed on the Div. I level. In addition, high school and youth
wrestling is booming in Oregon, and there is a true community interest
in wrestling. The smart decision for Portland State would be to continue
the wrestling program.
IT HAS BEEN A DIFFICULT SPRING FOR WRESTLING AND OTHER MENS SPORTS
Ever since the concept of proportionality has been forced upon college
athletic departments, the spring has become the slashing season. This
is when colleges make final decisions for the next school year budget,
and this is often when programs get cut. The Spring of 1998 has been
especially bloody.
In 1997, wrestling survived the spring onslaught fairly well. However,
in 1998, wrestling has not fared well. Three teams have been eliminated
for good - Div. I Georgia State and junior college teams Fergus Falls CC
and Bismarck State College. The athletic director at Div. I Chicago
State has decided to drop wrestling, but the proposal is currently under
review by the administration. Plans to drop wrestling have been
announced Div. I Portland State and Miami of Ohio, where the final
administrative steps are being taken on the proposals. Rumors that other
college teams are in danger continue to fly. In some cases, colleges
will quietly drop a team, and the public will not find out until the
next season.
This is an across the board problem for mens Olympic sports, and
wrestling is not the only victim of the 1998 Spring Slaughter. The Univ.
of Cincinnati wiped out mens rifle, tennis and indoor track. New Mexico
State cut mens track and field and swimming. Southwest Texas State has
eliminated mens tennis. The Univ. of Louisville dropped mens indoor
track. These are all high profile Div. I programs and were reported in
the media. Other smaller schools have made decisions to slash programs
to little fanfare.
Title IX was originally written by Congress to create opportunity for
women students. The intent of the law was NEVER to eliminate opportunity
for anybody. However, as the Spring of 1998 continues to prove, the
unintended consequences of Title IX are that opportunity is being lost
at an alarming rate.
CONSULTANT DANIEL ADDS FUEL TO THE FIRE WITH HIS ATTITUDE ABOUT
WRESTLING
A new sports management magazine, Street and Smiths SPORTSBUSINESS
JOURNAL, had a 15-page report on Womens Sports in its May 11-17 issue.
Almost every page trumpeted the positive results of Title IX. Only one
page was devoted to cutbacks in mens programs, which the publication
called oddball economics.
Many colleges hire outside Title IX consultants to propose plans to
assist in reaching gender-equity goals. One such consultant, Lamar
Daniel, was quoted in this story:
l I feel for wrestlers, and track is going to get hit hard, said
Lamar Daniel, an Atlanta-based gender equity consultant. Its tragic.
Yet, on the other hand, women deserve the opportunity to compete. And I
have yet to meet an administrator who was crazy about wrestling.
Daniels negative statement about wrestling is not only inaccurate but
it makes wrestling a target.
We would like to suggest a few administrators who ARE crazy about
wrestling.
How about Bob Bowlsby the athletic director at the University of Iowa,
who has been a long-time leader within both NCAA wrestling and USA
Wrestling. Bowlsby is also considered one of the top young
administrators in the nation, and is a member of the NCAA Management
Council.
How about Bruce Baumgartner, the athletic director at Edinboro
University of Pennsylvania. All Baumgartner has done is win four Olympic
medals in freestyle wrestling as an athlete, and coach champion Div. I
wrestling teams at Edinboro.
Or Curt Blake, the athletic director at Rider University, who is the
president of the East Coast Wrestling Association and a long-time
wrestling supporter? Or Rondo Felberg at Brigham Young University, an
athletic director who has publicly supported his schools wrestling
program.
Consider Dr. Peter Likens, the President of the University of Arizona,
which does not currently have a wrestling team. Likens is a member of
the National Wrestling Hall of Fame as a Distinguished American.
Daniels smug remark about administrators dislike for wrestling is not
constructive and does not address the issues at hand. Currently, there
are 300 colleges that sponsor wrestling, with competition at all levels.
Certainly, there are many college administrators that do support
wrestling.
CONSIDER WOMENS CREW, A GROWING NCAA SPORT THAT HAS NO INTEREST BASE
The article in the Street and Smiths SPORTSBUSINESS JOURNAL which
included Daniels comments is entitled Rowing Across Kansas? Credit
Title IX. This article points out how one of the three prongs of Title
IX, interest and abilities, is generally ignored in the push for
proportionality.
Consider these excerpts from the article, written by Welch Suggs:
* Why would Kansas State need a varsity womens crew team? Rowing is
about as popular as banana growing in the countrys breadbasket... But
the K-State women have a boat that answers the question. Its christened
the Title IX.
* Womens crew and womens soccer are hot sports in the NCAA these days
because most require large teams. And large womens squads can balance
the 100-plus athletes that football coaches require for programs.
Is there an interest in womens crew? Consider the 1997 National
Federation of High School Associations statistics. In the ENTIRE
nation, there are only 42 girls high school crew teams. But, in the
1996-97 NCAA statistics, there were 54 NCAA womens rowing teams. There
are more women competing in crew in college than in high school. How
does that reflect interest and abilities?
Consider wrestling. In 1996-97, there were 8,730 high school wrestling
teams. The 1996-97 NCAA statistics indicated 250 NCAA wrestling teams.
Womens crew is a perfect example of how Title IX is being used a
gender quota, with no consideration for the interest and abilities of
young people.
NORTH DAKOTA PLANS TO CUT A MENS TEAM, AND IT COULD BE WRESTLING
Administrators at the Univ. of North Dakota, a NCAA Div. II school,
have indicated that there will be changes in their athletic department,
including the elimination of one mens sports team. The university is
facing a budget crunch. A review of the athletic department is on-going,
with the announcement of which team will be cut to be made shortly.
The local media have speculated which of the university programs may
get the ax, with wrestling and baseball considered the most likely
choices.
Consider this quote from an article in the Grand Forks Herald, the
local paper:
* A sport - and the best bet is wrestling - will be gone. Its not just
because of the 95-percent pronouncement of the governor. The other
driving force is the pursuit of gender equity.
If North Dakota drops a mens sport and does not add a womens team, it
shows once again how the use of proportionality does not promote new
opportunities.
The North Central Conference, which UND competes in, has a strong
wrestling tradition. Wrestling is a popular sport among young people in
North Dakota. There are 54 high school teams with 1,075 participants.
Many North Dakota prep wrestlers compete successfully on the college
levels.
We encourage the wrestling community in North Dakota to fight loud and
hard for this important team.

Comments & Questions -- info@ncmat.com
|